Teamwork - a long entry

Wayne Gretzky knows a little about hockey.  In an interview during Canada’s Gold medal game, he mentioned the value that  the Canadian team players put on “team”.  20 of the top young hockey players in Canada (and the world) put aside their individual goals and ego’s and decided to play for one common purpose - to win.  

I don’t think anyone who’s ever played a team sport would argue about this point.  So here’s a question I’ve been chewing on - How does teamwork play out in a staff at a church?  Does it matter?  Would the church look any different if pastoral staff just took care of their individual areas of responsibility and never focused on the “team”?  

If I were to research growing ministries vs. dying (or maintaining) ministries, I’m guessing that “teamwork” has something to do with the growth (a huge assumption I know).   Churches that are plateauing or have lost momentum probably don’t have a strong view of a team and a common goal.  Whether they know it or not, the staff and ministries are well meaning people who are doing their best but are lacking the focus and motivation to work toward a common goal as a whole church.   

Here’s a hypothetical example; Church on the northside is a traditional church that has existed for 30 years.  If anyone (from the outside) would look at the church, they could tell you that they are mearly existing and not really “reaching” anyone.  There seems to be no momentum  or excitement.  The senior pastor is convinced his way of “reaching”people or growing the church is right.  The leadership will support him but in the back of their minds they feel differently.  The music pastor feels the way to reach people is different than the senior pastors so he takes every opportunity to share this with his worship teams.  The children’s pastor is trying her best but feels that childrens ministry is the most important ministry in the church.  She feels lonely and isolated, so she vents her frustrations with her staff and parents.   The youth pastor is young and excited but feels that his role is to train church kids in theology and do nothing else.   O.K.   This situation is TOTALLY hypothetical but very realistic at the same time.  I’m not thinking of any certain church or ministry but I’m sure that many churches this scenario is playing out over and over. 

What’s the problem?  The pastoral “team” is not working together.  They have their own goals and own systems that they feel will work the best and none of them are supporting a common goal (or each other).   The congregation is hearing different messages wherever they go and therefore they are divided as to who’s idea’s or leadership is the best.  The result is turmoil and accomplishing nothing. 

What is needed?  The team to get together and decide what message and method they will all use.  Decide, as a staff, to support that message and method or GET OUT!   If a staff member cannot support the common goal or vision in public (or private) than that staff member should not be on staff.  It’s not that it’s a bad church, or he/she a bad pastor - it’s just not a good fit. 

It really comes down to PRIDE.  Are church staff members willing to get behind something (even though they might now agree 100%) and support it?  Would you, as a pastoral staff, be willing to give up your style of ministry or structure of ministry for the sake of one common purpose?   

I see superstars sit the bench and play on the fourth line just to win a gold medal.  Would it be too difficult for some staff members to change their attitude at times to support a win? 

Those are my thoughts.  It’s a great topic that I might sit on for a while.

Explore posts in the same categories: as deep as I get

2 Comments on “Teamwork - a long entry”

  1. Bryce Ashlin-Mayo Says:

    Great question and post. I used your question and subsequent thoughts as a spring board for my post today.

    The link is here:
    http://www.incipiosermo.com/2008/01/question-8-teamwork.html

  2. Erik Says:

    Brad, I must admit to my own struggle at finding identity and a sense of placement within the framework of a team. I am not sure why that is whether it is my own intrinsic “Maverick” drive, growing up having to do most things on my own, or some sort of psych issue which causes me to rebel against any kind of authority. In truth, I am not sure why I am even sharing this with you but I hope that it resonates with some of your thoughts.

    Too often when I think of telling someone that they must “fit the mold” I can’t help but feel like a “big headed” dictator who’s only objective is to achieve the ideological (communal or personal) end which is perceived. Even if that end alienates and excludes those who would choose another means. I think that is the major issue that influences my feelings in these regards. I don’t want to exclude or alienate anyone because I know what that can feel like!

    All said, I agree with you too. Team work has a major affect on the embodiment of the gospel. I don’t think the Trinity would have worked without it! Likewise, unity within the community and its leadership must be both personal and corporate. Especially when considering the holistic and organic needs that the human community has.

    I guess then I am left (I hope not alone) to struggle with this internal paradox of how to best submit to the communal movement without giving up my own or asking others to give up their dreams and self expressions. More questions… which has more value in relation to the Kingdom: the individual’s dreams, passions, goals or the community’s? How do we quantify the communal identity within a movement? If the means to living within the Kingdom are truly diverse in nature, all resulting in a holistic end, what parameters are there and how can we be aware of them personally and communally?

Comment: